
The Czech Republic’s Tax Administration, through Jiří Žežulka, Director of the Audit Section at the General Financial Directorate, has publicly stated that holding structures used for tax optimisation are among the new priorities for tax audits. According to published information, the tax authority has identified approximately 130 groups of companies for which it expects additional tax assessments totalling around CZK 3 billion. In particular, structures utilising dividend exemptions, holding company reorganisations and the associated exemptions relating to the sale price of business shares and shares, or the return of non-monetary contributions made outside the share capital, are coming under increased scrutiny. In all such transactions, the Financial Administration examines their economic rationale and the possible existence of abuse of rights.
A holding structure is, of course, not in itself anything illegitimate. On the contrary, it is a common tool for managing groups of companies, acquisitions, asset protection, financing investments or the generational handover of family businesses. However, the tax authorities have indicated that they will focus on cases where, in their view, the structure was created primarily for the purpose of obtaining a tax advantage, in particular the exemption of dividends or the avoidance of withholding tax.
Another significant development affecting the activities of the Financial Administration is the very recent judgement of the Supreme Administrative Court in the ADOZ, s.r.o. case. In this case, the Supreme Administrative Court confirmed that the prohibition on the abuse of rights may be applied to a holding structure where such a structure is established primarily for the purpose of obtaining a tax advantage without a corresponding economic justification.
Rozsudek je významný zejména tím, že správci daně poskytuje argumentační oporu pro zpochybňování holdingových struktur založených před výplatou dividend nebo před jinými transakcemi přinášejícími významnou daňovou úsporu. V dané věci byla za zneužití práva označena aplikace osvobození při výplatě podílu na zisku mateřské společnosti, aniž by tyto prostředky následně putovaly k fyzickým osobám. Tedy i čistě korporátní peněžní pohyb, jehož osvobození od daně je formálně v souladu s tuzemským zákonem o daních z příjmů a příslušnou evropskou směrnicí, může být za určitých okolností označen za zneužití práva.
Every entrepreneur or group of companies utilising a holding structure should now also be prepared for arguments arising from the Supreme Administrative Court’s judgement in the FPPV s.r.o. case.
It is precisely this judgement that emphasises that the mere existence of a tax advantage is not sufficient to conclude that there has been an abuse of rights. The tax authority must prove that the main or one of the main purposes of the arrangement was to obtain a tax advantage contrary to the spirit and purpose of the legislation. At the same time, all the economic, commercial and organisational reasons that led to the creation of the structure must be carefully assessed.
The judgement does not provide a precise answer to the question of in what circumstances the establishment of a holding structure is justifiable and legitimate; however, it sets out the aspects that the taxpayer is required to demonstrate.
In many cases, it is therefore neither necessary nor advisable to wait for the tax authority to give notice of the commencement of a tax audit; instead, it is possible to assess in advance whether the current structure of the holding company is relatively safe or, conversely, exhibits certain signs of an abuse of rights.
Even before the tax authority gets in touch, we are able to ask similar questions and review the holding company’s arrangements – thereby steering the holding company into safer waters ahead of any potential audit by the tax authority.
The Tax Administration has openly identified holding structures as one of the main areas for future audits. Every holding company should therefore not only be prepared for questions from the tax authority arising from the ADOZ judgement, but should also have sufficiently strong arguments in line with the conclusions of the FPPV judgement. It is advisable to begin preparing the defence of a holding structure even before a tax audit commences. If a tax audit is already underway at your organisation, we can, based on our experience, share our perspective on the matter or suggest possible tactics for the next steps…
Responsible Managers
Jan Tecl
Radim Hanák